Connect with us


The Senate passes a landmark gun control package



The Senate passed a bipartisan package on gun safety Thursday night, ending a nearly 26-year impasse on the issue in the wake of a recent streak of major mass shootings.

The “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act,” which passed 65-33 after weeks of negotiations — and which is expected to become law, doesn’t go as far as many Democrats wanted. But it introduces tailored reforms meant to incentivize states to keep guns out of dangerous people’s hands, provide new protections for domestic violence victims, enhance screening for gun buyers under the age of 21, and crack down on illegal gun purchases and trafficking.

The bill also provides billions of dollars in additional funding for school safety and mental health resources. Democrats have stressed they don’t believe that America’s gun violence epidemic can be solved by investments in mental health resources, as Republicans have argued, but have said that they won’t pass up the opportunity to put more money towards mental health.

The last time Congress passed a major piece of gun legislation was in 1994, when it enacted a now-expired 10-year ban on assault weapons. Though there were attempts to pass gun control legislation in Congress following the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, they failed. The recent mass shootings at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, and at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York created a renewed urgency for some federal action on guns.

Sens. John Cornyn of Texas (R-TX), Thom Tillis (R-NC) , Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) were the primary negotiators. Ultimately, 15 Republicans and 50 members of the Democratic caucus ended up joining them in voting for the bill.

“It’s taken a decade, because for too long Congress has failed to make meaningful progress on gun safety reform,” President Joe Biden said in a statement Thursday. “I call on Congress to finish the job and get this bill to my desk.”

The bill is expected to go there shortly, after a vote in the Democrat-controlled House.

What’s in the Senate’s gun control bill

Unlike the 1994 law, the bill doesn’t explicitly ban any weapons. Instead, it creates new rules around gun ownership and provides incentives to states to enact their own gun control measures.

The bill would allocate $750 million to supporting states in implementing extreme risk laws, or “red flag laws,” that temporarily prevent people who have been found by a court to pose a risk to themselves or others from obtaining a gun. Currently, 19 states and Washington, DC, have red flag laws. Most of these states are controlled by Democrats, with the exception of Florida and Indiana.

Research has suggested that such laws can prevent mass shootings, given that about half of mass shooters tell someone about their plans in advance and exhibit warning signs such as agitation, abusive behavior, depression, mood swings, an inability to perform daily tasks, and paranoia.

The bill would also close what’s called the “boyfriend loophole.” Under current federal law, only those who are convicted and are living with their partner, married to their partner, or have a child with their partner are barred from buying a gun.

Some states have already passed laws to partially or completely close the loophole, but this would do so at a federal level by prohibiting people convicted of domestic violence while in a “dating relationship” — defined as a “relationship between individuals who have or have recently had a serious relationship of a romanic or intimate nature” — from purchasing firearms. People convicted of non-spousal misdemeanor domestic abuse would be able to own a gun again after five years if they keep a clean record under the bill. But convicted spouses would still be banned from purchasing guns for life.

Gun buyers under the age of 21 would face enhanced background checks under the bill. They would be subject to an elongated, three-day initial review process of juvenile and mental health records, including checks with state databases and local law enforcement. If that initial review process turns up anything of concern, the buyer would have to undergo an additional review process spanning up to 10 days. The bill also provides additional funding to federal and local law enforcement to carry out those background checks and keep accurate criminal and mental health records.

One other thing the measure would do is clarify and expand the definition of a “federally licensed firearms dealer.” That’s important because current federal law only requires that licensed gun dealers conduct background checks when someone attempts to buy a gun. However, unlicensed sellers, such as people who sell guns online or at gun shows, don’t have to conduct background checks.

Finally, the package creates new federal criminal offenses for interstate gun trafficking and making straw purchases, meaning someone buying a gun on behalf of someone else, but telling the seller that they’ll be the owner of the gun. Though straw purchases are currently illegal under federal law, the idea is that the new offense categories will give prosecutors more tools to target criminals.

The bill has a few critical omissions

President Joe Biden, Democrats involved in the Senate negotiations, and gun control advocates have all said that the bill doesn’t go as far as they would like.

In a national address last month following the Uvalde shooting, Biden advocated for a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, raising the age to be able to buy a gun from 18 to 21, universal background checks, and allowing gun manufacturers to be sued if their weapons are used in violence.

None of those measures were adopted in the final version of the bill. But it’s been received as an important, incremental step towards further progress on gun control and a rare demonstration of bipartisanship on a hot-button issue that has stoked cultural divides.

Murphy said in a press conference earlier this month that he would have rather just raised the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21 and implemented universal background checks. But Senate Democrats met Republicans in the middle by enhancing background checks for young gun buyers and strengthening requirements for federally licensed dealers to conduct background checks.

“This bill doesn’t do everything. This bill will not end the epidemic of gun violence overnight. But it is substantial. It is significant. It will save lives, and it will provide us the momentum to be able to make further changes. That’s why I describe this as a breakthrough moment,” he added.

What happens now

The bill is expected to pass the Democrat-controlled House before Congress breaks for a two-week July 4th recess at the close of business this week, though it’s possible that the vote might not happen until the weekend. Biden has said that he intends to sign it once it reaches his desk.

But that won’t happen without protest from the House Republican caucus. Unlike Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who supported the bill, all three House Republican leaders — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, and House GOP conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik — have rebuked it.

At least some House Republicans, however, have announced that they intend to vote for the bill, including Rep. Tony Gonzales, who represents Uvalde.

“As a Congressman it’s my duty to pass laws that never infringe on the Constitution while protecting the lives of the innocent,” he tweeted on Wednesday.

It’s not clear, however, whether the bill might face legal challenges under the Supreme Court’s Thursday decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which, as my colleague Ian Millhiser writes, has put “vast swaths of American gun laws … in terrible danger.”

The court created a whole new framework for evaluating gun control laws that purports to be based on the text of the Constitution, as well as the history of English and early American gun laws. That framework could jeopardize a number of provisions in the Senate bill, including modern inventions like red flag laws and protections for victims of domestic violence.

That means that while it marks major progress, at least some of the bill could be vulnerable to legal challenges from pro-gun groups and states.

This Article was first live here.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


THOUSANDS Turn Out Early to See President Trump in Mendon, IL the Day After Roe v. Wade Is Overturned — PHOTOS



President Trump speaks at campaign rally in Toledo, Ohio January 9, 2020 by Kristinn Taylor

Day after Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, President Donald Trump will hold a rally with Representative Mary Miller (R-IL).

The 45th president will hold a “Save America Rally” at the Adams County Fairgrounds in Mendon, Illinois, Northeast of Quincy, on Saturday, June 25, 2022, at 7:00 PM CDT.

President Trump is expected to deliver statements regarding the SCOTUS’ recent decision to ban abortion.

Trump will endorse incumbent, first-term U.S. Rep. Mary Miller of Oakland. Miller voted against certifying the election results on January 6, 2021, according to a report.

TRENDING: MUST SEE VIDEO: Day 1 of the Abortionist Insurrection – Democrat Leaders Lead Calls for Mass Violence, Violent Mobs Terrorize Communities, Crack Heads

“I’m honored President Trump is coming to the Quincy area to hold a rally after endorsing me over RINO Rodney Davis, who stabbed President Trump in the back by voting for the sham January 6th Commission,” Miller said.

Miller went on Twitter Saturday morning to offer her gratitude for President Trump.

“Today, we woke up in a post-Roe America. The end of Roe v. Wade would not have been possible without President Trump. I will be thanking him tonight in-person at our rally in Adams County!” Miller tweeted.

Doors won’t open until 2 pm but thousands of supporters are already in line to see President Trump. Here are some of the photos at Mendon, Illinois:

Join the RSBN broadcast team LIVE from Mendon, IL for all-day coverage of President Donald J. Trump’s Save America Rally:

This Article was first live here.

Continue Reading


How the Abortion Decision Helps Donald Trump



John Ellis: “First: it changes the subject, something the Trump camp has been quite desperate to do since the Committee hearings began.”

“Second, it reminds the Republican Party’s most important constituency — white evangelical Christians — just who made yesterday’s ruling possible. That would be, first and foremost, Donald Trump.”

“Third, it requires all the other GOP candidates for the 2024 presidential nomination to acknowledge (and feign admiration for) Trump’s role in Roe’s reversal. This reinforces the perception that the Republican ‘field’ of candidates is actually two fields: Trump and everybody else.”

“Fourth, and this is always a consideration in Trump world, it enables an aggressive direct mail fund-raising campaign, asking small donors to express their appreciation for Trump’s role in the reversal of Roe by sending money to the coffers of what might be called the Trump Bank for Future Endeavors. Such an appeal will raise a lot of money.”

LoadingSave to Favorites

This Article was first live here.

Continue Reading


Asking teachers to shoot former students is mental cruelty



There is a fundamental problem with this belief system: Those students who come into schools and conduct a shooting? These kids with guns who murder aren’t just criminals, they are also former students of the educators. When teachers say that they don’t want to be armed, there are very valid reasons.

I have had experience with great police officers and bad ones. I’ve had a police officer be part of saving my life from a violent crime, and I’ve seen an officer protect someone from abuse. What even someone with the right training will tell you is that these events have an emotional impact, and they had no personal relationship with the person beforehand.

Imagine, if you will, having a gun in your drawer as an educator and being expected to shoot and kill someone you taught as a young student. You might have known them as a second-grader or a fifth-grader. Maybe you knew them as a sixth-grader. You remember them helping your class, the fun of teaching them how to tie their shoes or read. 

Suddenly, that same student is armed with a weapon of mass destruction and you are expected to forget all of that and take down the student. Students can be frustrating, but they can also be a source of great personal pride. Many of us have fond memories of our teachers. Many teachers have fond memories of students. Certainly it is the love of the profession that keeps teachers doing it, not the money. 


Republicans are far less concerned about solving problems and far more concerned about promoting gun sales. 

That isn’t a solution, it’s mental cruelty. Plain and simple.

This Article was first live here.

Continue Reading