Connect with us

Business

Key data on U.S. J&J, Moderna COVID-19 boosters weeks away, Fauci says By Reuters

Published

on

Key data on U.S. J&J, Moderna COVID-19 boosters weeks away, Fauci says By Reuters


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Top infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci responds to accusations by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) as he testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on Capitol hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 20, 2021. J. S

By Chris Prentice

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Data needed to determine the advisability of booster shots of the Moderna (NASDAQ:) Inc and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:) COVID-19 vaccines is just weeks away, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said on Sunday.

Health officials signaled they expected boosters would ultimately be recommended for a broad swath of the population, but urged Americans not to seek booster doses until they have FDA approval.

“We recommend that people wait until you get to the point where you fall into the category where it’s recommended,” he told CNN.

On Friday, a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel recommended a third shot https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-covid-19-booster-debate-moves-fda-vaccine-advisory-committee-2021-09-17 of the two-dose Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for people age 65 and older or at high risk of severe COVID-19, but declined to endorse boosters for the wider population.

Though the FDA is not bound by the panel’s recommendation, it will take it into consideration when deciding whether to recommend a third round of shots.

“This is not the end of the story,” Fauci told CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “They’re going to continue to look at this, literally in real time,” Fauci added.

People who have received the two-dose Moderna vaccine or one-dose J&J vaccine are still awaiting guidance on possible booster shots.

“The actual data that we’ll get (on) that third shot for the Moderna and second shot for the J&J is literally a couple to a few weeks away,” Fauci told NBC’s “Meet the Press” program.

“We’re working on that right now to get the data to the FDA so they can examine it and make a determination about the boosters for those people,” Fauci added.

More data may also show a broader need for booster shots across the general U.S. population, Fauci said.

The United States leads the world in total reported COVID-19 cases and deaths. Nearly 676,000 people have died during the pandemic in the United States, figures compiled by Reuters https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/countries-and-territories/united-states showed. An increase in U.S. cases and deaths in recent months has been most acute in areas with lower vaccination rates even as federal health officials implore vaccine holdouts to get their shots.

Biden announced in August https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/08/18/remarks-by-president-biden-on-fighting-the-covid-19-pandemic-2 the government’s intention to roll out booster shots for people age 16 and older, pending approval by the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention experts.

The FDA’s decision-making process does not negate the White House’s position favoring boosters, Fauci said, saying the plan was always contingent on FDA’s regulatory process.

Dr. Francis Collins, director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, said on the “Fox News Sunday” program that he expects it would “become clear over the next few weeks that administration of boosters may need to be enlarged,” citing existing data from the United States and Israel indicating waning vaccine effectiveness over time.

The officials also signaled the timeline for vaccine authorization for children from 5-11 years old is in the coming weeks.

“For kids 5 to 11, the data is supposed to come in at the end of this month, and FDA will be working 24-7 to go through it,” Collins said. “So we all hope that can happen in weeks, and not months.”

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function()
{n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘751110881643258’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);



Source link

The Real Preneur provides exclusive top stories of the day, today headlines from politics, business, technology, photos, videos, latest English news and much more

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

British man of Somali heritage named as suspect in Amess killing

Published

on

British man of Somali heritage named as suspect in Amess killing


A 25-year-old British citizen has been named by government officials as the terror suspect arrested for the killing of Sir David Amess, the Conservative MP fatally stabbed on Friday.

Amess, the representative for Southend West in Essex, was stabbed multiple times during a meeting with constituents at the Belfairs Methodist Church in Leigh-on-Sea. Essex Police said that a man was arrested following the incident and they were not looking for any other suspects.

One senior Whitehall official confirmed that Ali Harbi Ali, a 25-year-old Briton of Somali heritage, was the suspect being held. One individual with knowledge of the situation said that it was unknown why Ali had targeted Amess. “It’s unfathomable,” they added.

London’s Metropolitan Police declared the killing a terror incident on Saturday, with the force’s counter-terrorism command taking over the investigation from local forces.

The Metropolitan Police on Saturday evening said the suspect had been arrested under section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which allows for extended detention before charge, and that magistrates had granted them until Friday, October 22, to hold the man in custody.

The force said it had conducted searches of three London addresses in connection with the investigation. It has not said where the addresses are.

Neither the force nor a Home Office official would confirm reports that Ali had been referred to the Prevent counter-terrorism programme, which aims to divert people showing signs of either Islamist or far-right radicalisation.

MI5, the UK’s domestic security service, is working closely in support of the police investigation. The Met also said a postmortem examination had been undertaken on Saturday.

Prime minister Boris Johnson, leader of the opposition Sir Keir Starmer, House of Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle and home secretary Priti Patel paid tribute to Amess in his Essex constituency.

Johnson laid a wreath that described Amess as “a fine parliamentarian and a much loved colleague and friend.” Starmer wrote that he was “a dedicated public servant, a husband and a father.”

Meanwhile Priti Patel, home secretary, said that the government would “continue to review and strengthen the measures” to protect the safety of MPs.

“We cannot be cowed by any individual or any motivation — people with motives who stop us from functioning to serve our elected democracy — so on that basis we have measures in place,” she said.

The Labour party is not expected to stand a candidate in the Southend West by-election to elect a new MP. One party insider said it would follow the Tories’ decision not to run in the 2016 Batley and Spen by-election following the death of Jo Cox, the Labour MP who was murdered outside a constituency surgery.

Amess’ killing in a place of worship shocked religious communities across the UK. Three mosques in Southend on Saturday published a joint statement denouncing the “brutal and senseless killing”.

The killing was “an indefensible atrocity, committed on the grounds of a place of worship”, the statement for Essex Jamme Masjid, Faizane Madina Masjid Southend and Southend Mosque said. “We condemn it in the strongest possible terms.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Massive strike averted: Hollywood crews reach a new three-year deal with studios

Published

on

Massive strike averted: Hollywood crews reach a new three-year deal with studios


General view of the Hollywood Sign on November 17, 2020 in Hollywood, California.

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin | GC Images | Getty Images

A deal has been struck between Hollywood’s studios and a union representing its film and television crews that would avert a historic strike that has threatened to shut down production across the industry.

On Saturday, The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) announced a new three-year contract that addresses IATSE’s calls for better working hours, safer workplace conditions and improved benefits.

The new contract includes a 10-hour turnaround between shifts, 54 hours of rest over the weekend, increased health and pension plan funding and a 3% rate increase every year for the duration of the contract.

It comes less than a day before IATSE’s strike deadline. This strike would have been the first in the union’s 128-year history and the first major crew strike since World War II.

The deal must still be ratified by the union’s membership.

IATSE represents a wide swath of industry workers, from studio mechanics to wardrobe and make-up artists. In total, it acts on behalf of 150,000 crew members in the U.S. and Canada. Around 60,000 of those are covered by the current TV and film contracts being renegotiated.

An industry-wide strike would have essentially stopped Hollywood production across the country in its tracks, similar to what the writer’s strike did 14 years ago. That strike, between 2007 and 2008, led many shows to shorten or postpone new seasons and led to the cancellation of others.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Covid-19, Integrity And The Premiership: First Clues To Pandemic’s Role In Match Fixing

Published

on

Covid-19, Integrity And The Premiership: First Clues To Pandemic’s Role In Match Fixing


November 17th will mark the second anniversary of the first reported case of Coronavirus. Two years of turmoil have ensued—with the sports industry suffering agonies no worse to other sectors of the global economy. Despite this, fears of financial collapse have played out particularly publicly in the sector. Meanwhile, as business gradually returns normal, experts and analysts warn that Covid-19 has left all sport with a problem that could prove particularly infectious, unless acknowledged. As I first reported for Forbes in November, both football association FIFA, and bilateral law enforcement body Interpol had embarked on initiatives to highlight the threat to fair play spawned by the pandemic. Research conducted by StatsPerform and Starlizard Integrity Services on suspicious betting activity across all flights of soccer, including the English Premier League, add empirical evidence to the spartan news coverage published so far. While the reports authors are reticent to draw immediate conclusions—due to the data gathering difficulties caused by the pandemic itself, as significantly fewer fixtures than normal were played—the betting patterns observed across 61,296 soccer matches show that transnational crime is a real, and resilient threat to the beautiful game. In the absence of action, there is a real danger that crime could rob fans of their faith in results, and in the teams they support.

Fate Of A Nation: Why Wealth Inequalities In The F.A Premier League Provide A Useful Litmus To Risk Of Foul Play

Fears of bankruptcy among teams in Europe’s upper leagues, relate directly to the ghostly stadiums which fans witnessed when leagues in Europe and the United States locked down, during the first quarter of 2020. While a handful of teams in the English Premier League, the Bundesliga, the Serie A and La Liga had successfully leveraged decades of league success to license their brands, globally, most in soccer’s top flight were considerably less liquid. While the same is true across developed nations, Covid-19’s effects on the English Premier League may be most revelatory when studying the threat of soccer’s infiltration by criminal organizations. Though rich, the distribution of finance between teams varies enormously. As industry experts and analysts—such as Price Waterhouse Cooper, and Deloitte, state—the business acumen on show in the Premier League can also oscillate wildly between football clubs. Teams who play alongside Manchester United and Chelsea often rely on budgets that are just a fraction of those leading the league. As PwC are particularly keen to explain, diversification of revenue and adaptation to new technology an identifiable problem—for many C-suite executives globally, not least those based in the U.K. In some cases, teams went in to the Coronavirus pandemic with low cash reserves, and commercial norms that had hardly changed for seven decades.

As Deloitte highlight, most clubs weighted spend on player salaries were, and remain, outside the norms appropriate to business in any other sector—likely to an extent that is subtly but still significantly greater than comparable sides in Europe and North America. With such significant outgoings, clubs outside the top four ranking teams in the Premiership entered the pandemic dependent on ticket sales at the turn-style. When Great Britain entered its first lockdown in the first quarter of 2020, this vital source of revenue evaporated. In the absence of weighted revenue streams, Premier League clubs entered the pandemic with different risk exposure. Neither Stats Perform nor Starlizard identifies successful attempts by organized crime to engage clubs in any form of improper behavior—but prevailing constructs on corruption in English law traditionally tie financial impediments and acute stress to heightened risk of impropriety.

Findings: Stats Perform & Starlizard Integrity Services’ 2021 Suspicious Betting Trends in Global Football Report

As Stats Perform Integrity and Starlizard Integrity Services’ 2021 Suspicious Betting Trends in Global Football Report highlights, it is too soon to claim to know the extent of the Premier League’s exposure to match fixing—not least, whether the related criminal offences which would almost certainly accompany such an accusation have occurred in any UK fixture. Both companies preface the data set by underscoring how global betting patterns reported during the pandemic have certain unfortunate flaws—which derive from a significantly smaller number of football matches being played under Covid-19 conditions in 2020. This said, the report does intimate that match-fixing in football is targeting new leagues, perhaps at higher levels than previously known, with transnational crime making important adaptations to the loopholes which regulators cannot restrict diligently and reactively, within the confines of Coronavirus laws.

In an interview by telephone from his office in London, Jake Marsh, who is Global Head of Integrity at Stats Perform, clarified that there were clear differences between the methodology of the 2021 report “due to league closures, and the number of matches played in 2020, which, in contrast to comparable years, were far fewer due to the closure of most soccer leagues in the United States and Western Europe”.

Despite concerns raised by various watch-dogs, as I have previously reported, the fear that football faced heightened risks as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic have not been proven—which is why Stats Perform and Starlizard’s work is framed as a primary source data set for conflation with research from the sector, unlike the work both organizations performed in the prior three reports.

As Marsh was keen to qualify, only 217 (or 0.35%) matches played in 2020 were identified as suspicious. This represents a reduction in both real and percentage terms from the 456 (or 0.56%) of the matches cited in the company’s 2019 report. From a strictly empirical perspective, 2020 is in fact the third successive year that the proportion of suspicious matches identified was reduced. As Marsh told me, by phone, “the matches identified were now over 50% fewer than the figure given in our inaugural report back in 2018, when approximately 0.73% of matches we investigated were identified to be suspicious”.

Yet this does not negate, nor explain, several new trends which present—often during the most confusing moments of the Coronavirus pandemic, and likely, if proven to significant criminal gain.

Unfriendly Matches: Sheikh & The Demand For Football Fraternity During Lockdown

As Affy Sheikh, who is CEO and founder of Starlizard Integrity Services’ elaborated to me, by phone, ‘Friendly Matches’—which have long been attractive to criminal syndicates, for their low profile, high remuneration betting—became “considerably less friendly” during the initial phase of the United Kingdom’s Coronavirus lockdown.

Sheikh, whose background includes work for UK and European security services, heads the joint party to Stats Perform’s work. In addition to consulting on integrity for the Premier League, and Italy’s Serie A, Sheikh advises national football associations in Central and Eastern Europe—including the Moldovan and Slovakian soccer federations. In his view, the ‘friendly’ took on an usual and potentially suspicious form as Europe and the United States isolates themselves.

“The suspicious betting patterns on such matches doubled in 2020, when compared to 2019” Sheikh told me, in an interview by telephone, also from his home in London. “This means that for comparable purposes, the overall percentage of suspicious friendly matches doubled, rising from 0.67% in 2019 to 1.19% in 2020. The majority of these matches took place during the spring months when most competitive leagues were suspended.

While Sheikh feels it is not helpful to be “state specific” on what is “clearly a transnational threat, comprising the cross-border entities and individuals present in all forms of organized crime” Sheikh did disclose that the majority of these suspicious friendlies were played in three countries, where analysis has shown professional leagues have become considerably less prone to fixing—which is obviously a coup for fans. The counter argument, though, is that fixers were instead more selective—riding improved trust for the integrity of players and officials, to decisively and profitably rig a handful of results outside league ties. Sheikh declines further comment, on basis that the report will require “further substantiation and discussion in our sector, and between all of our partners” which seems a reasonable and cautious consideration for the current time, as others begin to embark on similar work to collate with Stats Perform and Starlizard.

End Game: Soccer’s Uncomfortable Lessons From Covid-19

In a report titled “A whole new ball game: Navigating digital transformation in the sports industry” Deloitte implore the soccer industry—in both the United Kingdom, and beyond—that to avert the financial position which will exacerbate risk to integrity during future shocks, lessons must be learned. The auditor warns [that] “digital will need to be embedded in every aspect of the business, transforming people, processes, and technology”.

These are sentiments echoed by Price Waterhouse Cooper, whose fall 2021 report “Sports Industry: Ready For Recovery?” canvasses 792 industry leaders, in 55 countries. According to David Dellea, who heads PwC’s Sports Business Advisory team, optimism reigns—with PwC’s findings revealing “the imperative for sport to better confront today’s collective responsibilities”.

In PwC’s view, teams, leagues and owners must now “frontally embrace societal challenges, using their influential platform not only to promote human well-being and environmental protection, but [to] more concretely play an active role in developing a stronger society”. A redoubled focus on sustainability, fan engagement and new technology makes for sound counsel—but any politicization of leagues in the United States and United Kingdom has proven highly divisive. Dellea’s belief that “the reality of the world at large is now directly shaping the future of our industry” is sound council—yet ignores the serious problems which sport has embraced during Covid-19. For their to be any meaningful progress on the lessons of Covid-19, it would seem sacrosanct that financial stability first be secured—which PwC’s delegated predicted to be a five year project. Without this, steps to improve soccer’s governance, close funding gaps, entrench fair play, and underscore best practice will always encounter the same hurdle. It’s probably fair to say that panic about threats to integrity on the pitch closely mirror concerns about business integrity which require redress, too.

Issues such as the opacity of player ownership has led other bodies to voice concerns about the potential for conflicts of interest between team and owner. Couple this with the long shadow that the gambling industry has been alleged by UK lawmakers to cast its influence over teams—whose very existence, never mind solubility, depends on shirt sponsorship, and it’s challenging not to tie soccer’s pandemic morals with wider trends in many developed countries. Many timely questions about fairness will hinge on the ultimate outcome of leaks such as the “Pandora Papers”. Yet a fairer, stronger, cleaner game, is foregrounded in statistics—which is precisely why this first look at integrity during Coronavirus is so much more valuable than anecdote.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Recent Posts

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Categories

Trending